EuGH · C-229/81 · 09.02.1982 · ECLI:EU:C:1982:46
Grounds Operative part Grounds 1 ARTICLE 92 ( 1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE PROVIDES : ' ' WHERE IT IS CLEAR THAT THE COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF AN APPLICATION LODGED WITH IT IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 38 ( 1 ), THE COURT MAY BY REASONED ORDER DECLARE THE APPLICATION INADMISSIBLE . ' ' 2 THAT PROVISION MUST BE APPLIED IN THE PRESENT CASE . IT IS CLEAR FROM THE VERY TERMS OF THE ORDER MADE ON 20 JULY 1981 BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE TRIBUNALE , VARESE , THAT HE IS REQUESTING THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES TO ' ' ENFORCE , BY HIS DECISION ' ' , THE ORDER WHICH HE HAD MADE ON 12 MAY 1981 FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF A TECHNICAL EXPERT ' S REPORT . NEITHER THE TREATIES NOR THE MEASURES ADOPTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING THEM CONTAIN ANY PROVISION EMPOWERING THE COURT OF JUSTICE OR ITS PRESIDENT TO ORDER THE ENFORCEMENT OF A DECISION OF A NATIONAL COURT . 3 CONSEQUENTLY , BOTH THE COURT AND ITS PRESIDENT PLAINLY HAVE NO JURISDICTION TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE TRIBUNALE IN HIS ORDER OF 20 JUNE 1981 , AND THE APPLICATION MUST THEREFORE , BY VIRTUE OF THE ABOVE-CITED PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 92 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE , BE DECLARED INADMISSIBLE . Operative part ON THOSE GROUNDS , THE COURT HEREBY : DECLARES THE APPLICATION TO BE INADMISSIBLE .
